Brian Clarks Play Whose Life Is It Anyway? Essay -- Brian Clark Whose

Brian Clarks Play Whose biography Is It Anyway?The play Whose Life Is It Anyway by Brian Clark was made into a stageplay and film. The telecasting play was made in 1972 and the stageplays in 1978. In the play, indite by Brian Clarke, the intenseargument of committing Voluntary Euthanasia is discussed.The main maneuver of the play, Ken Harrison, once an imaginative, devotedsculptor, is involved in a majestic car crash. Following a longoperation, Ken is paralyzed from the sleep with down he is informed that hemay never be able to move his body ever again. Brian Clark in a alike(p) way uses different characters to show adifferent view of Kens possibilities. Dr. Emerson thinks Kens vivificationis precious and should be kept at any cost, no outcome what Kenswishes are. Dr. Scott alike wants Ken to stay alive but values Kens sight and thoughts more than than Dr. Emerson, she thinks sympathy a lot.Dr. Travers shows a view on Kens problem, he sees it the same way asDr. Emerson, an d thinks of it as a mental patient of wanting to commitsuicide, and is happy to back up Dr. Emerson in a court of law, andalso sees it as doing a favor for Dr. Emerson, no theme what he findswhilst talking to Ken. In order to make the play more dramatic the debate further Brian Clarkuses a dramatic point. The point is that forrader Ken suffered hisaccident he was happy and wanted to go on living, but at that time bulk listened to him and he could fork up argued a point and hoi polloiwould have listened to it. Now that Ken finds himself in a situationwhere he doesnt want to go on living, few people want to listen tohim Only my brain functions unimpaired but even that is unsatisfyingbecause I cant act on any conclusions it comes to.... ...uthanasia isbecoming his decision. The lights out at the end of the playrepresents kens decision to follow euthanasia if the light would havebeen left on then he may have dogged to live.Euthanasia should not be made legal because it will be e asily misusedunnecessarily. Euthanasia would not only be for people who areterminally ill, it will become non-voluntary. I also believe thatEuthanasia is a rejection of the importance and value of human life. activated and psychological pressures could become overpowering fordepressed or dependent people. If the superior of euthanasia isconsidered as good as a decision to converge care, loads of people willfeel guilty for not choosing death. pecuniary considerations, added tothe concern about being a burden could serve as powerful forces thatwould lead a person to choose euthanasia or assisted suicide.