Is Modern Art Really Art? Essay

Dead animals, elephant guck, un do beds and rice all seem alike everyday objects but should we be foretelling them invention?When we were growing up we were taught that device was a beautiful painting like Van van Goghs Sunflowers, or a perfect sculpture of a tender like Michelangelos David, but we were never really taught that conceptual and present-day(a) artistic production were proper forms of art, even though it was established in the sixties. It made us think and challenge our own assumptions of what art should really savor like.People didnt understand the idea of cows cut in half (Damien Hirst), wire mesh lockers (Mona Hatoum), rubble (Richard Long) or rubbish (Tomoko Takahashi) macrocosm called art unless you could frame it nicely on your living room wall. The item that this type of art didnt fit neatly into peoples ideas of what art should be was the reason it was called conceptual.Conceptual and contemporary art got a huge reaction out of people because they fe lt conned and marginally embarrassed when, for example, they looked at Martin Creeds light going on and off and didnt devil it. They didnt like the fact that they couldnt work out the true meaning of what the artist was laborious to get across.It also got a reaction for another reason which was the simplicity of about of the art. Im sure that when all the people who were functional long hours every week looked at the well-paid artist Tracey Emins unmake bed they were desperately screaming to themselves, BUT I COULD DO THAT and mentation whether conceptual art is even worth looking at.Maybe more or less of us be completely missing the point they are trying to get across. Maybe instead of drowning in the depression of how easy, and perhaps pointless, the art is we should be fresh-eyed and open minded and celebrate the fact that these ideas and possibilites have been subject for us. Maybe thats the point.This art definitely has originality and knock value. Artists dont want to repeat whats been d unrivaled before in the same office no one wants to hear old jokes. Their use of new engineering science adds to the quality of some of their work. Using a computer isnt a cop-out of drawing, its just another tool. The originality and shock value go hand-in-hand and afterall, arent those the two matters we want when we look at art? We as viewing audience dont want to stand there looking at something so bland, tasteless and overrated If we wanted that then we could just as easily stick a slice of bread on the wall and call that art. The artists look for new challenges and ways for us to see their art. This type of art makes us challenge ourselves to find beauty in the everyday things in life.My opinion of Modern Art is a very balanced one because even though some of the examples of conceptual and contemporary art are sometimes ridiculous, they also challenge you to find the true meaning of what it stands for. The shock factor aswell hypnotizes us and keeps ou r attention locked on the beauty of the art.One thing that fascinates me though is that if artist Chris Ofili paints with elephant dung he is seen as a food turner Prize winning genius, but if I tried to paint with elephant dung would I be seen as an artistic genius? Probably not.