Is Violence in the Media Controversial? Essay

Do you stomach a particular song or movie that you just really love. If you do, nominate you ever considered the kind of music you listen to or the movies you watch knead the decisions you make about(predicate) almost e trulything. This whitethorn be really obvious, yet a lot of people underestimate it Its the power of the media. Media is very powerful and extremely influential. And as teen maturers, our minds are a lot to a greater extent(prenominal) absorbent to the things we see and hear around us. Thats why I think media should be censored. Probably the most common example of the exploit of media on teenagers is the Columbine shooting. Public contr all oversy about ruddy matter in the media has a long history that extends as far cover version as the graduation exercise decade of the twentieth century in the join States.The earliest controversies revolved around depictions of criminality in the movies, and the very first case of movie censorship occurred in 1908, when the police in dinero refused to provide a permit for the public display of the movie The throng Boys in Missouri. Authorities objected to the content of the film because it boil downed on uncivilised law-breaking (Hoberman, 1998). The scientific study of the effects of media abandon may not extend as far back as 1908, but it was exactly a few years later that media force out became a focus of the first major investigation of the content and effects of movies. wildness in the media has become a contradictory heydayic. piece whatsoever individuals believe that media ferocity places hunting lodge in danger of chaos, others find that frenzy in the movies and on television has no negative effect on societal communities. inquiry has shown that there are pros and cons to having violence displayed in the Violence in the Media 3media. The study of media sources (particularly violence in word picture games, television, and movies) with real-world aggression and violence over t ime. There doesnt seem to be many positive aspects to bowelless television shows or movies, but theres at to the low-downest degree one advantage to reflexion violence, such as catharsis. There provide eer be the delve over why some people react with violence after reflection violent media and some do not, but the fact remains that there are few goodish reasons to see so much violence in such perspicuous detail. Many social scientists support the correlation however some scholars point that media research has methodological problems and that findings are exaggerated (Ferguson & Kilburn, 2009 Freedman, 2002 Pinker 2002 Savage, 2004).Measuring aggression and its causes has always been an important focus for social psychologists, partly because excessive aggression isnt tolerated in our society, and overly aggressive individuals often find themselves in fling because of their fashion. The first experiments on the impact of media violence on human behavior were conducted by psychologists and sociologists who applied theories of social growing and modelling behavior i.e. they theory that people saw violent behavior on TV and copied it. The more violent behavior they saw, especially violence that went unpunished, the more potential they were to have in a violent manner themselves. Since the 1960s and Albert Banduras Bobo snort experiments, there have been many studies by social psychologists attempting to establish a causative relationship between media violence and aggressive behavior.Violence in the Media 4Complaints about the possible harmful effects of mass media front throughout history even Plato was concerned about the effects of plays on offspring. Various media/genres, including dime novels, comic books,jazz,rock and roll, role playing/figurer games,television,movies,internet (by computer or cell phone) and many others have attracted speculation that consumers of such media may become more aggressive, rebellious or immoral. This has led some scholars to answer statements made by some researchers merely fit into a cycle per second of media-based moral panics.Several scholars (e.g. Freedman, 2002 Olson, 2004 Savage, 2004) havepointed out that as media content has increase in violence in the past few decades, violent crimes among youth have declined rapidly. Although most scholars caution that this decline cannot be attributed to a causal effect, they conclude that this observation argues against causal harmful effects for media violence. A new-fangled semipermanent outcome study of youth found no long-term relationship between playing violent video games or watching violent television and youth violence or bullying.Violence in the Media 5Pro Catharsis TheoryThe catharsis theory implies that chance(a) interactions cause individuals to accumulate frustrations. These frustrations could lead to the individual committing violent acts if not released by other means. match to this theory, watching others engage in viol ent acts on television or in the movies relieves the individual of daily frustrations, and creates a society filled with less violence. In essence, the catharsis theory deems media violence as a positive attribute because an individual can release tension without physically harming another individual.Con Violent ThoughtsResearchers have undertaken studies that support the thought of media violence initiating violent thoughts in children and gravids. According to the theory of observational learning, children learn through example. As such, kids who unable to decipher the difference between existence and fantasy will imitate behavior viewed on television. If not corrected, these children have the potential to exhibit violent as children and throughout their adult lives. From the perspective, violence in the media initiates violent thoughts that individuals eventually carry out.Violence in the Media 6Pro Reinforcement TheoryThe reinforcement theory holds that media violence reinfo rces prior beliefs about violence in society. When speaking of media portrayals, the reinforcement theory indicates that violent acts seen in the media occur in society when aggressive behavior already surrounds the viewer. Individualswho learned that violence is wrong will not be influenced by the media to commit such acts. In fact, people whose believe violence to be bad will use such behavior in the media to chant their opposition.Con Justifiable ViolenceRegardless of an individuals beliefs about violence, The Center for Media and Public Affairs (CMPA) holds that aggressive behavior in the media presents the topic of violence being a justifiable solution to societal problems. According to CMPA, many television shows with a protagonist through violent acts. While good ruling over evil is a positive concept, some television shows and cinemas do not demonstrate the human consequences of violent acts. misery to exhibit such consequences informs the viewing audience that violence is the only justifiable means of solving a problem and aggressive behavior has no consequences associated with ita concept that is certainly untrue in society. On top of all that, seeing these themes at such a young age helps desensitize him to it when it occurs in reality.In an example world, all there would be more child appropriate television, and parents may do more to rampart their kids from the guns and explosions that is like a shots media. Unfortunately, we dont live in an ideal world, so I think the media should set their violent content to low, not overkill. Also, not only is their trial impression that the lack of non-violent television is get to our kids, but the media has, (whether intentionally or not), shown in a sense, what the violence on television has done to children. The Effect of Violence in the Media on Children Television, movies, and video games are a big part of childrens lives in todays technologically advanced society. However, there is a big stateme nt questioning the effects of these media outlets on children. Much of society claims to have proof for the belief that media violence affects children negatively.However, I am skeptical of the evidence that is state to prove that claim. I feel that society has placed the blame on these mediums for the violent acts, however serious or trivial, that children commit way in like manner easily, before they even begin to examine the parenting of todays society. topic Association for the Education of Young Children supports the reinstitution of FCC standardsestablishing limits on violent depictions during hours children are likely to watch television. Standards would also control the degree to which violence is depicted so as to be perceived by children as a universal and acceptable response to problems, as equated with power, as leading to reward or glorification of the perpetrator. An additional strategy would be to develop a paternal guidance rating system for network.Violence in t he Media 8 finishingThere are many issues surrounding this age-old debate and the perceived effects of violence in the media. Over the past fifty years various studies have both proved and disproved the links between violence in the media and aggression in real life. But somehow the identical questions keep coming up Who is responsible for the violent content in the media? The arguments on each side of the debate are very powerful, and hale on years of discussion, and anxiety about the effects media violence capacity be having on our society as a whole. Parents need to be aware that much of what children watch on television is not specifically intended for children.It has been estimated that only 10% of childrens viewing time is dog-tired watching childrens television the other 90% is spent watching programs knowing for adults. Parents can assist children in finding alternatives to viewing adult television. You need to sift through the research material and have a look at the d ifferent views of parents, psychologists, academics, audiences and media producers. Check who has authored any given report, and how that efficacy affect their conclusions e.g. are they affiliated to a religious group, or an perseverance association? The irony at the heart of the Violence in The Media debate is that a lot of the media coverage of this topic which condemns violence, actually incorporates violence and is designed to stimulate violent reactions.REFERENCES1. Savage, J., & Yancey, C. (2008). The Effects of Media Violence on Criminal assault A Meta-Analysis, Criminal Justice and Behavior. Sage. 2. Berkowitz, L. (1965). Some Aspects of Observed Aggression. ledger ofpersonality and social psychology 12 (3) 359369 3. Bender, H.E., and Kambam P., Pozios V. (2013). Does Media Violence Lead to the sure Thing. 4. Brown, Governor of California Supreme Court of the United States (personal communication, June 27, 2011) Entertainment Merchants Association. 5. Freedman, Jonatha n L. (2002). Media violence and its effect on aggression Assessing the scientific evidence. Toronto 6. Ferguson, C. J. Kilburn, J. (2009). The Public Health Risks of Media Violence A Meta-Analytic Review. The Journal of Pediatrics 154 (5) 759763 7. Singer, D., & Singer, J. (1984). TV violence Whats all the fuss about? Television & Children, 7(2), 30-41.